I suggest that you keep the 6am PDT, which is now UTC 13:00 / 21:00 in China.

Otherwise, you will conflict with ARM Band (7am PDT) or IPv6 (8am PDT) no 
matter you use *odd* hour bridge or *even* hour bridge.

Thanks
Bin

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 5:33 PM
To: Christopher Price <[email protected]>; Jose Lausuch 
<[email protected]>; Gaoliang (kubi) <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; Tomofumi Hayashi <[email protected]>; Ulrich 
Kleber <[email protected]>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <[email protected]>; Dave 
Neary <[email protected]>; Lijun (Matthew) <[email protected]>; 
'TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV' <[email protected]>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Dovetail weekly meeting agenda


Here is a list of topics I propose we try to cover this Friday:


1)      Test case requirement update (Dave Neary) – 20 min

2)      Danube plan review – agreement on TSC report on 3/21 (Wenjing) – 20 min

3)      Functest/yardstick/testWG dependencies update: result DB, refstack, 
interface, http/https – (Mathew/Jose/Chris P…) – 15 min

4)      Dovetail test/qa/CI requirements (Uli/Leo) – 15 min

5)      How to get started on test area/test case review (Bryan/Wenjing) – 15 
min

6)      AOB – 5 min

This is based on a 1.5 hour long meeting as we discussed last week. If you are 
to lead a topic, please come prepared so we can make max use of the meeting 
time. Thanks.

I also saw Hongbo’s meeting invite that reverts back to our original 7AM PDT 
spot (while rest of the world stays the same hour). I’m not sure if that slot 
is free from GTM bridge conflict for 7:00 – 8:30 period, or if something needs 
to be changed. Hongbo, can you help sort the bridge problem out? I’m unable to 
login to verify one way or the other. It says I have no permission.

Also, Does anyone in US have problem with the new time?

Regards
Wenjing

_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to