Hi Dave, all, Sorry for misunderstanding your point. In that case, is there any other feedback from other TSC members on the proposal?
Tapio & Ray, I think we should reserve some time in next week's TSC to go over the suggested test scope (both mandatory and optional parts) for Danube compliance testing once more so that the Dovetail team can be confident about focusing on the right things. Regards, Tim -----Original Message----- From: Dave Neary [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 01:53 To: Tim Irnich <[email protected]>; Wenjing Chu <[email protected]>; Christopher Price <[email protected]>; Tianhongbo <[email protected]>; Tallgren, Tapio <[email protected]>; Georg Kunz <[email protected]> Cc: TSC OPNFV <[email protected]>; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [dovetail] TSC and DoveTail meeting to discuss scope and needs for CVP testing Hi Tim, On 06/20/2017 09:02 PM, Tim Irnich wrote: >> I would like to see us document some of the NFV related requirements >> which are common across all RFCs from telcos, and which are available >> in all viable VIM products. > > This is exactly the intention of the proposal, under the side > constraint of drawing from already existing tests. The question to the > TSC was if this is enough for an initial release. I think your answer is no. On the contrary - the initial release scope is fine, my comment was on the "future plans" piece. Thanks, Dave. -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
