+1 From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Georg Kunz Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 7:54 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Email vote on merge of SDNVPN test cases
Hi Dovetailers, Thank you for the votes so far. As an intermediate result, we have 5 +1 votes, which is a majority. Nevertheless, this is a kind reminder for the Dovetail committers who have not voted yet to cast their vote. Thanks a lot. Cheers Georg From: Georg Kunz Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 10:34 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: [dovetail] Email vote on merge of SDNVPN test cases Hi Dovetailers, You are all well aware of the accidental merge of the SDNVPN test case scope and description [1] without a +1 vote from a majority of the committers. We have discussed how to handle this already a few times, but we have not yet reached an officially documented conclusion. Since I caused the mishap, I'd like to work towards a clean resolution of the situation by calling for an official vote. We couldn't have a vote on IRC during the last call due to a lack of quorum, so we agreed to move to an email-based vote. There are basically two options for resolving situation: i) Revert the merged patchset. This includes creating an inverse patchset which again needs to be voted on by committers in order to get it merged ii) Approve the patchset post-merge There are currently 9 committers in Dovetail. I won't vote myself for obvious reasons. So, I propose the following procedure: Please cast your vote on the following question: "Do the Dovetail committers approve the merge of the SDNVPN test case scope and description [patchset 34343]? (-1, 0, +1)" If at least 5 committers (not counting myself) vote +1, the patchset is considered approved and we'll keep it. If less than 5 committers vote +1 or there are -1 votes, I'll prepare an inverse patch. [1] https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/34343/ Sorry for causing extra effort. Thanks, Georg
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
