Few comments on this

  *   To Fatih’s point (also developed in the thread [1]) and t repeat myself, 
we need to converge on the issue of container versioning first before deciding 
on which toolchain to use (internal Jenkins build or dockerhub build server). 
From what I can see dockerhub builds may have some restrictions in the way you 
can tag your images, let’s just make sure it works with whatever versioning 
scheme we decide to use. We will get more and more containers built, if we 
don’t get versioning right it will be real hard to track artifacts to code 
commits
  *   I have not followed the thread but I’m curious to know why a container 
build order is needed (given that containers by design are independent of other 
containers at the build level)

Thanks

  Alec


From: <opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> on behalf of 
"morgan.richo...@orange.com" <morgan.richo...@orange.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 2:43 AM
To: Trevor Bramwell <tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>, 
"opnfv-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org" <opnfv-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN <cedric.olliv...@orange.com>, 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] 2 questions on OPNFV docker repo

Hi,

2 pending questions regarding the way we are managing our docker files

1) Cedric sent a mail 2 weeks ago ([OPNFV Helpdesk #42909] New Functest
Docker repositories) in order to create new docker repositories:
opnfv/functest-features, opnfv/functest-components and opnfv/functest-vnf

As it has not been done yet we are currently using Cedric's private
docker repo (where he customized the different hook)
ollivier/functest-components,  ollivier/functest-features and
ollivier/functest-vnf and we referenced them in releng

But, of course, it would make more sense to rely on official OPNFV
docker...

José asked Trevor B. to create the first repo (opnfv/functest-core,
opnfv/functest-healthcheck and opnfv/functest-smoke) before he left in PTO.

Cedric asked for the new repo on this mail thread. Should we create a
new ticket?

BTW it seems that there is an issue on the hooks used for OPNFV docker
repos. Builds must be done in a precise order (core must be built prior
to any other built), which seems not the case on OPNFV docker hub.
Cedric detailed the issue and the fix (screenshots) in the same mail thread.

Any help will be welcome to reference official sources.

2) At the moment the Docker automated builds are used per gerrit merge
for all OPNFV projects. As we are using a basic account and the number
of docker produced within OPNFV is increasing there is a high risk of
congestion.

Could it be possible to migrate to an account allowing parallel builds
(https://hub.docker.com/billing-plans/).

The cost is reasonable, we could start with a Medium or Large one.

As docker management is transverse, widely used by testing projects, Who
should take the lead to ask for such change to the TSC? Releng? Infra
Group? Testig group?

Any comment welcome

/Morgan

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss


_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to