Hi Alex, While your question is answered, Request you to clarify : This is also exported to Yardstick, Functest accordingly. I should feed there as os-odl-nofeature-ha say as an example or still os-odl_l3-nofeature-ha ??
Thanks -Venkat -----Original Message----- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Avadanii Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 4:50 AM To: RICHOMME Morgan IMT/OLN <morgan.richo...@orange.com> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Fuel/Armband ODL scenario rename in Functest test results dashboard Hi, Fuel and Armband projects renamed the ODL-L3 scenario to simply ODL, and dropped the ODL-L2 scenarios, as described in [1]. I noticed that the Functest results dashboard pages [2, 3] still use the old naming scheme, although the new scenario is also listed. Would it be possible to cleanup obsolete scenarios? Thank you, Alex [1] https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/FUEL-279 [2] http://testresults.opnfv.org/reporting/master/functest/status-f...@x86.html [3] http://testresults.opnfv.org/reporting/master/functest/status-fuel@aarch64.h tml _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
