+1 What about using tag "release-x.y.z" instead of "opnfv-x.y.z" since the name “opnfv” is already included in the image name? e.g. opnfv/functest:release-5.0.0 This way we differentiate between an official OPNFV release artifact from a none released.
- Jose - > On 27 Sep 2017, at 20:00, Raymond Paik <rp...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > All, > > Please let Alec know if you have any other questions/feedback on the > proposal. The plan is to have a quick vote on the TSC call next week > (October 3rd). > > Thanks, > > Ray > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 5:38 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acmor...@att.com > <mailto:acmor...@att.com>> wrote: > +1 and thanks for the proposal, Alex! > > > > Al > > > > From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> > [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] On Behalf Of Frank > Brockners (fbrockne) > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 4:44 AM > To: Alec Hothan (ahothan); opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> > Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed > > > > +1 – per what Alec mentioned below, the new tagging scheme is only a small > change incremental change from the earlier plans, but offers a lot of > flexibility moving forward. > > Frank > > > > From: Alec Hothan (ahothan) > Sent: Montag, 25. September 2017 21:34 > To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> > Cc: David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org > <mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; Fatih Degirmenci > <fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com <mailto:fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com>>; Frank > Brockners (fbrockne) <fbroc...@cisco.com <mailto:fbroc...@cisco.com>>; > Tallgren, Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <tapio.tallg...@nokia.com > <mailto:tapio.tallg...@nokia.com>> > Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed > > > > > > I would like to get a quick vote from any person that works directly or > indirectly with code in OPNFV > > > > Please reply with -1, 0 +1 > > > > For using prefixed git tags for the Euphrates release: “opnfv-5.0.0” > > > > This is a slight change to the plan on record (which was to use “5.0.0”). > This does NOT impact euphrates deliverables for participating OPNFV projects > (git tags on stable/euphrates are applied by releng). > > The only externally visible effect is the naming of container tags for > Euphrates official images in DockerHub will be named accordingly (e.g. > “opnfv/functest:opnfv-5.0.0”). > > Everything else remains the same. > > > > If you’d like to know more, the rationale is described here: > https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/releng/OPNFV+projects+and+OPNFV+release+versioning > > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_releng_OPNFV-2Bprojects-2Band-2BOPNFV-2Brelease-2Bversioning&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=BnFOET7vVz-l5p-4mFgkGMGDJq3nJ0-m_uI0LdNLdQY&s=KH73GpdZq3OZ_SwuUHsjspzPst6HyDEYqE5lm4amMts&e=> > (thanks for Fatih, David, Frank, Tapio for reviewing) > > In a nutshell, this adjustment is needed to prepare the path for proper > continuous delivery support by projects. > > Any clarification/questions/discussion can be done over email or at the TSC > or release meetings tomorrow. > > > > Thank You. > > > > Alec > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > <https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss> > > > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
