Hi Cristina, I will contact with joid team. If they don’t use huawei-pod12 anymore, Auto project can run on huawei-pod12
Thanks Tianwei Wu 发件人: Cristina Pauna [mailto:cristina.pa...@enea.com] 发送时间: 2018年7月3日 16:31 收件人: Joe Kidder <joe.kid...@gmail.com>; wutianwei <wutianw...@huawei.com> 抄送: Alec Hothan (ahothan) <ahot...@cisco.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; timothy.gres...@intel.com; trevor.coo...@intel.com; tina.t...@arm.com; Trevor Bramwell <tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org> 主题: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project What about intel-pod18 or huawei-pod12. They currently run Joid jobs, but with Fraser release done and development for Joid stopped, maybe one of these can be repurposed. Cristina From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> On Behalf Of Joe Kidder Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 5:05 AM To: wutianw...@huawei.com<mailto:wutianw...@huawei.com> Cc: Alec Hothan (ahothan) <ahot...@cisco.com<mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; timothy.gres...@intel.com<mailto:timothy.gres...@intel.com>; trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>; tina.t...@arm.com<mailto:tina.t...@arm.com>; Trevor Bramwell <tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project Wutianwei, Would a Huawei x86 pod be available for use by the Auto project for CI purposes? Thank you, Joe Kidder Auto Project On Jul 2, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Trevor Bramwell <tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: Hi Alec, Thanks for clarifying the use of POD 19. From what I know, most of the PODs at Intel are being used for development work. Regards, Trevor Bramwell On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +0000, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: please do not divert pod19, it is planned to be used for testing projects. We can certainly share it with Auto when not in use. The main requirement for pod19 is that we can rely on having a stable bare metal installer/openstack on it so we can regress on test projects – i.e. pod19 should not be used for testing installers or for running installer CI jobs. I’m not sure what “Auto CI” means exactly, if that relies on a stable openstack running, it might work (assuming it does not trash openstack after each run). Have you looked at other Intel pods? I only know of 2 that are used (12 and 19) and it seems there are more than 2 pods… Thanks Alec From: <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Trevor Bramwell <tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>> Date: Monday, July 2, 2018 at 8:40 AM To: <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Cc: <wutianw...@huawei.com<mailto:wutianw...@huawei.com>>, <timothy.gres...@intel.com<mailto:timothy.gres...@intel.com>>, <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>, <tina.t...@arm.com<mailto:tina.t...@arm.com>> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project Hi Intel and Huawei Lab Owners, The Auto project is looking for an x86 POD for running CI jobs on and I'm reaching out to see if you have any available resources they could use. I see Intel POD 19 may be available (now that plugtest is over), and Huawei POD 6 says it's IDLE. Could either of these or any other PODs be made available for Auto's CI jobs? Regards, Trevor Bramwell P.S. Trevor Cooper, I just remembered we discussed possibly using POD 19 for test projects, though I don't recall if we reached a decision on that. This message, including attachments, is CONFIDENTIAL. It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by law. If you received this email by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy it or disclose its contents to anyone. All messages sent to and from Enea may be monitored to ensure compliance with internal policies and to protect our business. Emails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, a mended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email transmission. Anyone who communicates with us by email accepts these risks. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21512): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21512 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23022389/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
