On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 11:03:35 AM UTC-7, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > > Hi David, > > this sounds a bit strange. >
Oh. And now I see that I didn't fully grok what one statement in the doc was saying. The PaxExam doc clearly states this (with my emphasis): > The test class may contain one or more methods annotated by > @Configuration, returning a list of options for configuring the test > container. > > If there is more than one configuration method, *each test method is run > for each configuration*. > > I definitely noticed the "one or more methods" statement before, but I never fully absorbed the second sentence, which now that I'm fully reading it, I see that it works very differently than I thought. I guess I'll have to do something similar to what you showed. For the Pax-Web Pax-Exam integration tests we're using a base class which > does some > basic configuration which is called by the annotated config method. > For example this test [1] calls the specific configuration method [2] > > regards, Achim > > [1] - > https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-web-itest/pax-web-itest-container/pax-web-itest-container-jetty/src/test/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/itest/jetty/HttpServiceIntegrationTest.java#L70-L73 > [2] - > https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-web-itest/pax-web-itest-container/pax-web-itest-container-jetty/src/test/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/itest/jetty/ITestBase.java#L59 > > 2016-10-25 18:47 GMT+02:00 David Karr <davidmic...@gmail.com <javascript:> > >: > >> I'm looking at a codebase with a bunch of PaxExam-based integration >> tests. They all have separate "config" methods annotated with >> "@Configuration". All of these methods are almost identical, all specifying >> several identical options. They only vary in the "features()" value. >> >> I believe that PaxExam will look for ALL the methods annotated with >> "@Configuration" and use the options provided there. The real question is, >> how does it merge those results, and what would it do with methods in a >> base class with this annotation? >> >> The critical question is whether it will intelligently deal with options >> that set the same property, but with different values. If the two >> annotated methods are in the same class, I wouldn't assume any priority, as >> there's no logical answer to that. However, if one method is in the base >> class and the other is in the subclass, logic says that the options set in >> the subclass would override the settings in the base class. >> >> I haven't seen any documentation that states how this would work. Is >> there any specification of this? >> >> -- >> -- >> ------------------ >> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "OPS4J" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > > Apache Member > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & > Project Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> > > Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master > > -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
