On 2019-10-18T07:02:55 +0200 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J <ops4j@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> IMO instead of adding own support we better should convince open-source > projects to add first-class support for osgi/JDBC service, so +1 for the > request from my side. As it seems you have added initial code for derby > (or at least readded it) you might want to contribute the code to > derby-project under required license? Thanks, all! Yes, I'm going to get the OSGi headers into the published Derby artifacts (at a minimum) this weekend. Implementing the OSGi JDBC service also looks pretty easy, so I'll be attempting that too. -- Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/20191018122228.78face26%40almond.int.arc7.info.
pgpWb4vGSynVb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
