Hi Grzegorz,

as I said, it's been 4.x compliant, for 6 I never was able to get a hold of
the TCK.
At the time beeing a friend of the project made the tests, and gave me the
results so I could fix them.
As the TCK needs to be paid for, it's not really possible to get a hold of
them.

regards, Achim


Am Fr., 7. Feb. 2020 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek <
gr.grzy...@gmail.com>:

> Hi Achim
>
> pt., 7 lut 2020 o 14:34 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J <ops4j@googlegroups.com>
> napisaƂ(a):
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in another thread I've just seen a lot of discussion about aliases etc.
>> If you think of refactoring Pax Web, please make sure you're able to
>> verify Pax Web vs. the OSGi TCK.
>> Cause the current basis has been checked to work with the OSGi
>> specification at the time when working on it. Luckily we had someone who
>> was able to get a hold of the TCK at the time.
>> He did some verification. Therefore I highly recommend to be very
>> cautious about changing to much of the underlying Http and Web services,
>> all of them have been proven to be valid according to the OSGi spec (which
>> at the time has been 4.3, I believe)
>>
>
> I saw so many changes (also related to R6 support) that I'm pretty sure
> that this compliance is long gone ;) But I may be wrong. Anyway - I'll do
> my best to do as little changes as possible.
>
> Definitely Pax Web is NOT R6 Whiteboard compliant (can't handle
> osgi.http.whiteboard.context.select=(osgi.http.whiteboard.context.httpservice=*)
> kind of context selection).
>
> Do you know how to get access to TCK? I'd be more than happy to be able to
> run it (also for Pax Logging!)
>
> regards
> Grzegorz
>
>
>>
>> thanks, Achim
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Apache Member
>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer
>> & Project Lead
>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> ------------------
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAD0r13dNhcrz65mpSiv_Zjd7P3p5f1VxvDJ9PJrwj44QWHP4iw%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAD0r13dNhcrz65mpSiv_Zjd7P3p5f1VxvDJ9PJrwj44QWHP4iw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> --
> ------------------
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhpxD4FOyn16bPBe7HkJCTKYq%2BnLnH7-gMhuZad-AgM18w%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhpxD4FOyn16bPBe7HkJCTKYq%2BnLnH7-gMhuZad-AgM18w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 

Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAD0r13f_CKnapgWU-8u0OstY%2BL-6yuMEricYX%2BjUsNjbGk1Rsg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to