Hi Grzegorz, as I said, it's been 4.x compliant, for 6 I never was able to get a hold of the TCK. At the time beeing a friend of the project made the tests, and gave me the results so I could fix them. As the TCK needs to be paid for, it's not really possible to get a hold of them.
regards, Achim Am Fr., 7. Feb. 2020 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek < gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: > Hi Achim > > pt., 7 lut 2020 o 14:34 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J <ops4j@googlegroups.com> > napisaĆ(a): > >> Hi, >> >> in another thread I've just seen a lot of discussion about aliases etc. >> If you think of refactoring Pax Web, please make sure you're able to >> verify Pax Web vs. the OSGi TCK. >> Cause the current basis has been checked to work with the OSGi >> specification at the time when working on it. Luckily we had someone who >> was able to get a hold of the TCK at the time. >> He did some verification. Therefore I highly recommend to be very >> cautious about changing to much of the underlying Http and Web services, >> all of them have been proven to be valid according to the OSGi spec (which >> at the time has been 4.3, I believe) >> > > I saw so many changes (also related to R6 support) that I'm pretty sure > that this compliance is long gone ;) But I may be wrong. Anyway - I'll do > my best to do as little changes as possible. > > Definitely Pax Web is NOT R6 Whiteboard compliant (can't handle > osgi.http.whiteboard.context.select=(osgi.http.whiteboard.context.httpservice=*) > kind of context selection). > > Do you know how to get access to TCK? I'd be more than happy to be able to > run it (also for Pax Logging!) > > regards > Grzegorz > > >> >> thanks, Achim >> >> >> -- >> >> Apache Member >> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer >> & Project Lead >> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >> >> -- >> -- >> ------------------ >> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "OPS4J" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAD0r13dNhcrz65mpSiv_Zjd7P3p5f1VxvDJ9PJrwj44QWHP4iw%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAD0r13dNhcrz65mpSiv_Zjd7P3p5f1VxvDJ9PJrwj44QWHP4iw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- > -- > ------------------ > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OPS4J" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhpxD4FOyn16bPBe7HkJCTKYq%2BnLnH7-gMhuZad-AgM18w%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhpxD4FOyn16bPBe7HkJCTKYq%2BnLnH7-gMhuZad-AgM18w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- Apache Member Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAD0r13f_CKnapgWU-8u0OstY%2BL-6yuMEricYX%2BjUsNjbGk1Rsg%40mail.gmail.com.