On 8/19/13 1:55 PM, Michael MacFaden wrote: > Hi Joe, > > Thanks for sharing this, my comments inline. > > Marking this item as Proposal: Joe-1 > >> JMC: While I think the intention is to say that this MIB pulls from >> other, existing MIBs for common virtualization platforms, it may come >> across as being limited to only those platforms. Perhaps it is good to >> say that this MIB then attempts to generalize those modules to support >> other hypervisors as well? > > So is this just the wording that concerns you? > Juergen and others have raised generalization issue/asked others to > contribute.
Yup. This was just a nit that I thought the wording as is mught give the impression that this MIB is limited in scope to hypervisors of the specified flavors. Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke, CCIE #5384, | | SCJP, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, VCP ||||| ||||| Distinguished Services Engineer ..:|||||||||::|||||||||:.. Phone: +1 (919) 392-2867 c i s c o S y s t e m s Email: jcla...@cisco.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg