On 8/19/13 1:55 PM, Michael MacFaden wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> 
> Thanks for sharing this, my comments inline.
> 
> Marking this item as Proposal: Joe-1
> 
>> JMC: While I think the intention is to say that this MIB pulls from
>> other, existing MIBs for common virtualization platforms, it may come
>> across as being limited to only those platforms.  Perhaps it is good to
>> say that this MIB then attempts to generalize those modules to support
>> other hypervisors as well?
> 
> So is this just the wording that concerns you?
> Juergen and others have raised generalization issue/asked others to 
> contribute. 

Yup.  This was just a nit that I thought the wording as is mught give
the impression that this MIB is limited in scope to hypervisors of the
specified flavors.

Joe

-- 
Joe Marcus Clarke, CCIE #5384,         |          |
SCJP, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, VCP        |||||      |||||
Distinguished Services Engineer ..:|||||||||::|||||||||:..
Phone: +1 (919) 392-2867         c i s c o  S y s t e m s
Email: jcla...@cisco.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to