> I have one minor suggestion. The names of the protocols are not always > consistent. For example, section 4 uses usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol, > section 4.1 uses usm128HMACSHA224AuthProtocol, and the MIB uses > usmHmac128Sha224Protocol. I suggest using names of the form > usmHMAC128SHA224AuthProtocol in all cases.
Thanks for pointing this out. As suggested, the names will be unified to usmHMACxxxSHAyyyAuthProtocol in the next version. Johannes _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
