Warren Kumari schrieb am 06.03.2015 um 18:45: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: >> Dear chairs, >> >> I think I raised some points during WG last call that should be >> addressed and I think others supported this. So I would assume that a >> revised I-D is needed first before this goes to the IESG. > > Yup. Status in the datatracker is marked as: Revised I-D Needed - > Issue raised by WGLC > > I can still write up the shepherd report (it's not likely to change > much), but we'll not submit till the draft has been revised.
I have already updated my internal draft, but, due to the IETF 92, submission is not possible until March 22nd. -- Johannes _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
