On 2/15/2016 3:16 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
This is the third of 3 messages to determine what the OpsAWG should do
with TACACS+.
If the answer to the previous question is yes, should the RFC
describing the protocol itself (as opposed to any other document that
might describe appropriate use) be published as a standards track RFC?
Yes
Scott, Tianran and Warren
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
