Dear OpsAWG WG, This begins a WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel - this WGLC ends on June 29th.
This is the second WGLC for this document - it initially successfully passed WGLC in August 2014 (https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/current/msg03522.html) and was handed to the IESG for publication in early September 2014. After it was sent to the IESG (in Feb 2015) a very similar draft appeared - draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp. We realized that two, very similar documents, with significant overlap would be confusing, and so we requested that draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel be returned to the WG and asked the authors to merge them into one document. There was some delays, but this has finally been completed. The WG is requested to review the document and provide (clear) feedback on if you believe it is ready for publication. If not, please provide suggestions for improvement / text. Please note: Even if you said it was great on the first WGLC, it is very useful to repeat this comment now! W -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
