Hi Ranga, Sorry I've been quiet for a few days. I'll have more to say later. Please see below.
On 10/19/17 4:28 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote: > > I am not clear in my mind about why this should be the case for NTP server > i.e. why do we reserve a special URN for NTP server? Why is it not just a > "controller" like every other one? > The base assumption we had was that everyone needs name resolution and time. Also, if you standardize these names, it's easy for implementations to simply fill in the values, if they happen to know them. So for instance, during install of your controller, you might simply ask, “Should I include the local NTP servers I found in my ntp.conf files and DNS servers I found in /etc/resolve.conf?” Eliot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
