Support for adopting this work. On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:32 PM li zhenqiang <li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Support adopting this doc as an operator with the following comments. > > We are considering corelating VPN services with tunnels (SR MPLS TE tunnels > or SRv6 TE tunnels) and SR policies to provide specific SLA to our VPN > coustomers. So please consider to add those augmentations in the VPN service. > And I'd like to complete this work if we all determine those are necessary. >
See draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang which does the mapping for L3SM. Would be good to think how the grouping can be applied to L3NM as well. Thanks! Dhruv > Best Regards, > Zhenqiang Li > ________________________________ > li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com > > > From: Tianran Zhou > Date: 2019-09-29 14:28 > To: opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption call for draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-02 > Hi WG, > > This email starts a 2 weeks working group adoption call for > draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-02. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm/ > > This document proposes a L3VPN Network Yang Model (L3NM) to facilitate > communication between a service orchestrator and a network > controller/orchestrator. > > If you support adopting this document please say so, and please give an > indication of why you think it is important. Also please say if you will be > willing to review and help the draft. > If you do not support adopting this document as a starting point for work on > this topic, please say why. > This poll will run until Oct 14. > > Thanks, > Tianran and Joe > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
