Hi Douglas, On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, at 8:28 PM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) wrote: > 5) KRB5 and KRB4 need normative references. > TA> The KRB5 and KRB4 are not specifically used in this document, > rather, there is one field with an option that the client uses to > indicate how it authenticated, and these are option. This is not > verifiable, so it is recomended in the documen tnot to use this field > for policy.For this reason, it is not really useful to provide a > normative reference, but it is required for the document to explai > this. So have added:[AI+TA]
Please add Informative references for them then. If I decide to implement TACACS+ and don't know anything about Kerberos, I wouldn't know where to look. All your other changes are either good or I can at least live with them. Best Regards, Alexey _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
