> On May 20, 2020, at 11:50, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > > Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: >> The shepherd writeup contains this remark, which made me squint a bit: >> "More security review was asked for by the WG at various [times], and >> it is not clear that this input will be taken into account." Why's >> that? > > When I did the review of comments, there were a few comments/threads > in the archives which did not clearly have a followup action/commit/diff. > I am not sure if the WG decided that the comments were not relevant, or if > changes were made but not acknowledged. I don't know if the commenters > are happy with the result, or still waiting for a response.
I think at times in the email exchanges, the authors might have been buried under other things. That said, I don’t think they have outright ignored any comments at this point. Either they’ve been addressed, discussed, or are going to be addressed. I have the impression the authors are very keen on taking comments and improving the doc. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
