Hi Thomas, all,

I made a shepherd review of the document. The review can be found at:


*         pdf: 
https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/blob/master/draft-ietf-drip-reqs-06-rev%20Med.pdf

*         doc: 
https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/raw/master/draft-ietf-drip-reqs-06-rev%20Med.docx

Almost all the comments are minor. These are basically to enhance the 
readability of the document (shorten long sentences, etc.) and make idnits 
happy.

There is one "procedural" comment that it is better to discuss now as I suspect 
it will pop up in the process: Why the document is in the "Standard Track"?

I failed to see any valid reason especially that:
* The IANA policy for the target registry is Expert Review.
* We don't have any normative statements in the document.

Are there any reasons why the document should be in "Standards Track"?

Once these comments are fixed, I will start preparing the write-up.

Thank you.

Cheers,
Med

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to