Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11: Abstain
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I understand that L3NM is not a device model and that, as such, it is not intended to include every possible parameter. However, not leveraging existing work has resulted in inconsistencies: from using different names to changing implementation expectations. I believe that this result impacts the implementation-specific work needed to derive device-specific actions (using existing models) and potentially reduces the value of using this network model. Many WGs in the routing area work on related technology, including bess, idr, lsr, pim, bfd, rtgwg, and teas. However, I found no evidence in the archives that any of these WGs were consulted or asked to review this work. Both points (lack of reuse and lack of review) have been mentioned in the mailing list, so I assume they have been considered. This fact and the existence of multiple implementations lead me to ABSTAIN. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg