Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote:
> While the original pcap format has held up very well over time, a more
> modern format is needed for some applications. Pcapng is widely agreed
> to be that(*), and publishing a specification that has had input from
> the operational community is an important next step. I support WG
> adoption of this draft.
> GrΓΌΓe, Carsten
> (*) even if I would have preferred it to use CBOR β but CBOR would have
> had to be around much earlier to enable that choice.
There are a number ways in which I'd like to extend pcapng, and CBOR would
fit nicely them.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IΓΈT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
