Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A.3.4 and A.3.5. Note that IOAM has a direct export mode in an adopted draft with similar properties to PBT. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export/ The reference to draft-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark is now RFC8889. Thanks to Michael Scharf for the TSVART review. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
