From: OPSAWG <opsawg-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: 14 September 2022 15:28
Hello, WG. I like Henkβs subject icon. Makes for some attention-grabbing. This work has been discussed previously in opsawg, going back over a year. The authors have continued to progress the work and would like to gauge WG interest in adopting it. One might ask, why opsawg? The radext WG has been concluded, but, like IPFIX, there is interest in continuing to produce extensions for RADIUS. It was suggested by Benjamin Kaduk that opsawg was a potential fit for this work. Therefore, this kicks off a two-week CfA for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns/. Please comment on-list with support and/or discussion of the work. <tp> RFC6614 is a Normative Reference. This is Experimental and is TLS1.2 only Lots of mentions of TBAn with n from three to seven with 'see section 6.2' where there is no mention of them. The IANA Guidelines RFC recommends a two-tier structure of Group and Registry. The Group(s) involved here could do with a mention. Tom Petch Thanks. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
