From: OPSAWG <opsawg-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Thomas Fossati <thomas.foss...@arm.com> Sent: 17 October 2022 11:10
Hi, all, I was asked to bring to the list one comment from my shepherd write-up [1]; specifically, that draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls hasn't been reviewed by the YANG Doctors (yet). There seems to be an expectation [2] that the YANG Doctor review is completed before or during WGLC. I am not sure whether the expectation is still current, or needs to be relaxed for some reasons. This is also of interest to me because I am new to the shepherding process and I'd like to understand what are the (best) current practices in the YANG area. <tp> Ships in the Night. I have posted a comment about the lack of a YANG choice in the augmentation to RFC8519 in this I-D on the netmod list and to Mahesh as the author of RFC8519. One of the earlier revisions had a number of changes in it that looked very YANG Doctor-ish to me so I thought that someone had had a look at it even if the datatracker records no review. Tom Petch Cheers, thanks. t [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls/shepherdwriteup/ [2] https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-doctors-review#Purpose -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
