Hi Martin,

Thanks for the helpful comments. Please see inline.

Regards,
Bo

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] 
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 11:36 AM
To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service...@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; 
opsawg@ietf.org; adr...@olddog.co.uk; adr...@olddog.co.uk
Subject: Martin Duke's No Objection on 
draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-13: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email 
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory 
paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Bob Briscoe for the tsvart review.

- the Percentile definition sets fraction-digits to 3 but the description still
says it’s two decimal places.
[Bo Wu] Sorry for the mistake. Will fix in the next revision.

- Why not IOAM as a data source?
[Bo Wu] Thanks for pointing this out. We will add RFC9197 (Data Fields for In 
Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM)) as suggested.




_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to