Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 04:59:33PM +0000, Joe Clarke (jclarke): > Thanks for the summary, heas. > > I re-read the text, and, yes, you do cover a number of the situations > (including potential ways to handle clients with TLS going forward). On > another doc I reviewed as part of the OPS DIR, it was decided that grouping > text about (in that case) forward-looking considerations was worth it. > > In this case, the document is short, and perhaps that isn’t needed. I defer > to the general views of the WG and the authors on this.
Super; thanks! I will publish the current version with the other fixes that you requested later today. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
