Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this 
document.

Lars


> On Jan 3, 2023, at 22:11, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-12
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review Date: 2023-01-03
> IETF LC End Date: 2023-01-09
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: The document specifies the YANG data model for the Network Service
> Attachment Points.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> It seems to me that the Network Service Attachment Points are very similar to
> Network Termination Points. What are the major differences?
> 
> Thank you
> Linda Dunbar
> 
> 
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-c...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to