Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns-11: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This document targets deployments where a trusted relationship is in place between the RADIUS client and server with communication optionally secured by IPsec or Transport Layer Security (TLS) [RFC6614]. I don't understand what this sentence is trying to say. Does table 7 really clarify the sentences used earlier that say exactly the same thing but more compact? Why "Expert Review" and not "Specification Required" or "RFC Required" ? Registration requests are to be sent to radius-dhcp-rev...@ietf.org I thought we didn't put these emails in the documents anymore? But I guess IANA will get back to you on that. NITS: As a reminder, I would remove this part of the text. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
