On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:47 PM <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote:
> To further insist this is about an example, I made the following change: > > OLD: > 5. Applicability to Encrypted DNS Provisioning > > NEW: > 5: An Example: Applicability to Encrypted DNS Provisioning > > This change together with the current text is much more clear this is an > example to illustrate the use of This works for me. I'd leave it to you whether to make the following change. > == > Typical deployment scenarios are similar to those described, for > ^^^^^^ > instance, in Section 2 of [RFC6911]. For illustration purposes, > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Figure 1 shows an example where a Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) > is provided with an encrypted DNS resolver. This example assumes > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > that the Network Access Server (NAS) embeds both RADIUS client and > DHCPv6 server capabilities. > == And, as I noted in my previous message, I suggest removing the reference to RFC6977. Specifically, remove this sentence from the last paragraph of Section 6: Additional considerations specific to the use of Reconfigure messages are discussed in Section 9 of [RFC6977]. and [RFC6977] from Section 10.2. -- jinmei _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
