Thomas,
3. srhSegmentIPv6BasicList
"As specified in Section 2 of [RFC8754]" versus 5.5 / Description, "As
described in Section 2 of [RFC8754]".
3. srhSegmentIPv6ListSection
Remove "Exposes" for consistency with 5.6 / Description.
3. srhSegmentsIPv6Left
"Segment List from the SRH" -> "Segment List in the SRH" for consistency
with 5.7 / Description.
3. srhIPv6Section
Remove "Exposes" for consistency with 5.8 / Description.
3. srhIPv6ActiveSegmentType and 5.9. / Description
Remove the first "from" to avoid "from ... from":
Name of the routing protocol or PCEP extension from where the
active SRv6 segment has been learned from.
3. srhSegmentIPv6LocatorLength
The definition is inconsistent with 5.10 / Description.
5.4. srhActiveSegmentIPv6 / Additional Information
Changed from RFC8754 to RFC8402, is that correct?
Please say which section of the RFC is relevant.
5.7. srhSegmentsIPv6Left / Additional Information
Please don't duplicate the Description; just list the information once.
Thanks,
P.
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
