Hi Daniele,
apologies for the late reply.
I think inventory is somewhat orthogonal to this, but of course devices
and equipment (including chassis, line cards, equipment holders etc)
will be considered part of inventory. Therefore via transitive closure
it is certainly conceivable to make power consumption data accessible
via inventory. This could make sense as part of a consolidated
controller view of a network. However, on a network element itself, the
network inventory aspect would not apply but the metrics should still be
available so the device/equipment level category still applies. As to
whether device level data should be replicated as part of network
inventory data would presumably depend on the use case.
--- Alex
On 7/26/2023 6:35 PM, Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare) wrote:
Hi Alex, all,
Just following up on the comment I did ad the mic earlier today.
The drafts speaks about metrics at: device/equipment level, flow
level, path level, network level.
The device/equipment level covers power consumption per chassis, line
card and port at different loads of traffic, hence IMO should fall
into the inventory category.
Would you agree?
Cheers,
Daniele
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
