On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 9:13 AM, Joe Clarke < jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> With this work being adopted, the chairs would like to request someone to > step forward to serve as shepherd when the document moves to LC. There has > been a recent discussion between all WG chairs that ideal shepherds are > those that are not authors and have a vested interest in the work and can > both defend it and help to keep it moving through the process. > Just as a quick followup to this: Yes, it would be great if we can have volunteers from the WG serve as shepherds. It provides a whole bunch of benefits, including: 1: An additional set of (focused) eyes on the document. 2: It provides people with significant "behind the curtains" exposure - you get to see how the sausage is actually made 3: It provides a further backstop to confirm that the process was correctly followed (there does indeed seem to be consensus, the check and balances were all checked and balanced, etc). 4: It provides you with a taste of chairing, but with less work. If you are even considering ever chairing a WG, you can get a good head start by shepherding a few documents — ADs are likely to be more supportive if you've already demonstrated skill and judgment by doing so. W Additionally, chairs are *not* ideal shepherds. > > > > If you would like to raise your hand for this work, let us know. Authors, > if you know of someone that would be good give us the name or have them > reach out. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Joe > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
