You're right Joe. I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these four drafts
Regards, Samier On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 6:11 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> wrote: > I should have adjusted my boilerplate to say “these drafts”. I assume > your “this draft” is applicable to all four? > > > > Joe > > > > *From: *samier Barguil <samir.barg...@gmail.com> > *Date: *Monday, September 25, 2023 at 11:54 > *To: *Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> > *Cc: *opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org>, mohamed.boucadair < > mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>, Richard Roberts <rrobe...@juniper.net>, > Oscar González de Dios <oscar.gonzalezded...@telefonica.com>, Wubo (lana) > <lana.w...@huawei.com>, victor.lo...@nokia.com <victor.lo...@nokia.com>, > ivan.by...@rbbn.com <ivan.by...@rbbn.com>, Qin Wu <bill...@huawei.com>, > ke-oog...@kddi.com <ke-oog...@kddi.com>, luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com < > luis-angel.mu...@vodafone.com> > *Subject: *Re: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work > > Hello all, > > > > No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft > > > > Regards, > > > > Samier > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:28 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts: > > · draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac > > · draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit > > · draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit > > · draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue > > > > Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to > whether or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work. > > Please state either: > > > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > > or > > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > > > If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed > per IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179). > > > > Joe > > > >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
