Hi, Thanks to all folks who participated in the time schedule discussion on Thursday afternoon and provided good inputs; the side meeting spent one-hour discussing common model design for various use cases described in:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang/ (ACL policy activation based on date and time conditions) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-united-tvr-schedule-yang/ (manage network resources with time scheduled changes) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-contreras-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests/ (schedule on-demand OAM tests) We focused on the uses cases and network resource management with time-scheduled changes for the TVR scenarios. We do not see any issue with the scheduled OAM use cases and can create examples for human-readable and machine-readable scenarios. The authors of draft-united-tvr-schedule-yang and draft-contreras-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests agreed to use common building blocks such as grouping defined in draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang, once we show some examples that meet their requirements. The usage examples for other use cases will be provided in draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang in an appendix. The authors of draft-united-tvr-schedule-yang and draft-contreras-opsawg-scheduling-oam-tests will review and align with changes made in draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang to address their needs. Thanks again to everyone involved in the discussion; it was a very productive meeting and will ensure the reusability of models across different working groups." -Qin (on behalf of the team)
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
