Thanks for the quick responses and push on this draft.  And thank you, Med for 
stepping up to shepherd.  FYI, we have asked for a review from TSVART at Med’s 
request to see what the appetite is for a dedicated port allocation.

Joe

From: OPSAWG <opsawg-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Douglas Gash (dcmgash) 
<dcmgash=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>
Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 at 09:55
To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org>, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 
<mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>
Cc: John Heasley <h...@shrubbery.net>, Andrej Ota <and...@ota.si>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Confirm submission of I-D draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13
Dear OPSAWG, Mohamed,

This attest revision intends to address the majority of the issues raised in 
the last round of review (Thanks to Med)


There is one known outstanding issue at this time, to update the TLS 
Identification with reference to RFC 9525. We plan to include that, and 
revisions related to this draft version, shortly.

Many thanks.

The Authors.

From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmiss...@ietf.org>
Date: Tuesday, 23 April 2024 at 14:46
To: Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <dcmg...@cisco.com>, Andrej Ota <and...@ota.si>, 
John Heasley <h...@shrubbery.net>, Thorsten Dahm <thorsten.d...@gmail.com>
Subject: Confirm submission of I-D draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13

Hi,

The IETF datatracker Internet-Draft submission service has received your 
Internet-Draft
draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-07, and requires a
confirmation step in order to be able to complete the posting of
the Internet-Draft.
Please follow this link to the page where you can confirm the posting:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/142126/confirm/9c5e13a4722a901ff95632148619611b/


Best regards,

        The IETF Secretariat
        through the Internet-Draft submission service

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to