Hi Paul,

Following up on this document as well.

Thank you for performing the reviews.

Best regards,

David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist

On Tue May 14 12:48:27 2024, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> The new version with all received reviews and comments is available
> at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-
> ipfix/
> 
> Please see inline.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> De : Aitken, Paul <pait...@ciena.com>
> Envoyé : lundi 13 mai 2024 21:53
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>;
> drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org
> Cc : ie-doct...@ietf.org; opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
> Objet : RE: [Ie-doctors] [IANA #1363824] Expert review for draft-ietf-
> opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix (ipfix)
> 
> 
> Med,
> 
> In the new version:
> 
> 
> 4.1. The first 64 most-significant bits MUST be set to 0.
> 
> This seems to exclude reduced size encoding.
> [Med] These will be seen as leading zeros and will thus be reduced.
> However, I went with a unsigned192 rather than unsiggned256 for this
> IE
> 
> 
> Also, "while Kind 255 corresponds to the most-significant bit of the
> IE." is nolonger accurate.
> [Med] Yes, changed to “191”
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2 udpUnsfaeOptions
> 
> Typo: udpUnsafeOptions
> 
> [Med] Fixed.
> 
> 
> 4.1 and 4.2:
> 
> A bit is set to 1
> 
> should be "The bit is set to 1".
> [Med] OK
> 
> 
> 
> 5.  Operational Considerations
> 
> The note about reduced-size encoding will not be seen in IANA's
> registry.
> [Med] I moved that because this was a comment from Benoît to remove
> the reduced-size encoding from the description.
> 
> The note seems contrary to the statement in 4.1 that I quoted above.
> [Med] That statement was removed.
> 
> 
> Figure 4:
> 
> Repeating two points that I made previously:
> 
> [Med] Fixed.
> 
> The last 0x9858 (next to 0xC3D9) should be 0x9658. Else the figure
> does not correspond with the preceding text.
> 
> 9658 and 9858 are unnecessarily similar values. I would urge you to
> choose a different example.
> 
> P.
> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les
> messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere,
> deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
> privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
> been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to