Hi Michael, Thank you for addressing Paul’s and Roman’s comments. I will wait for Roman to confirm whether the changes you have made, mostly deleting the paragraphs that he put a DISCUSS on, whether he is ok with removing his DISCUSS on the document.
At the same time, looking at the number of diffs between -13 and the latest version of the draft, including a completely new section on “Interactions with mDNS and DNSSD”, another WG LC, albeit shorter (1 week), would be in order. Cheers. > On Jun 19, 2024, at 2:48 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > > Hi, I posted a -15 document that I hope addresses Roman's DISCUSS. > Paul has changed his Abstain to a No Objection a few weeks ago. > > As Mahesh (the OPSAWG AD) returned the document to the WG in early April, my > understanding, however, is that the WG may need to do another WGLC on it. > Perhaps Mahesh will decide to skip that or not. > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
