I see that you submitted a new revision over the weekend that addresses the nits around 2119 and the references. However, it raised two others. You reference both RFC1051 and 1201 (do you need the former if you have the latter?),
We now reference neither. [JMC] In rev -09 the references to 1051 and 1201 are still present. They're removed in the editor's copy at https://ietf-opsawg-wg.github.io/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype.html. [JMC] I want to push this draft to the IESG today. Can you and Michael submit this revision so we can move it forward? Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
