No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Ciao,
Massimo
On 06/06/2025 11:28, Benoit Claise wrote:
Russ, Massimo,
Gentle reminder so that we start the WGLC.
Regards, Benoit
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [OPSAWG]IPR POLL: draft-ietf-opsawg-prefix-lengths: Publishing
End-Site Prefix Lengths
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 13:00:50 +0000
From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]>
To: opsawg <[email protected]>
Hello, authors and contributorsdraft-ietf-opsawg-prefix-lengths
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-prefix-lengths/>(and
the WG at large). Ahead of WG last call, we want to get an updated lay
of the land in terms of IPR. Already some IPR has been disclosed.
Are you aware of any additional IPR that applies to draft identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft”
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
If yes to the above, please state either:
"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules”
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.
Please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.
Joe and Benoît
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
