Thanks Mahesh, that helps, it makes sense. From: Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 8 July 2025 at 00:21 To: Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <[email protected]> Cc: Gunter van de Velde <[email protected]>, The IESG <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Gunter Van de Velde's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-23: (with COMMENT) Hi Douglas,
On Jul 4, 2025, at 2:36 AM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Agreed, we will use this, however, one caveat, I understand that we should not make references in the abstract, so I think we need to just remove the clause “defined in RFC 8907”: Just a note. When it says not to have references in the abstract, what it is referring to is references using hyperlink. A textual reference to an RFC (without square braces) is fine. Cheers. Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
