Dear Thomas, Thank you very much for the thoughtful feedback. Please know that my late reply is in no way a reflection on its importance -- the authors are grateful and truly appreciate the time and care you put into your review.
Speaking also as an individual author, I fully agree with your points and want to express my thanks again for your valuable input. Best, Carlos. > On Jul 18, 2025, at 3:43 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Dear Tal, Carlos and Adrian, > > As an individual, I have reviewed the latest revision of the document. > > DOCX: > https://github.com/network-analytics/ietf-network-analytics-document-status/blob/main/document-review/draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization-09.docx > PDF: > https://github.com/network-analytics/ietf-network-analytics-document-status/blob/main/document-review/draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization-09.pdf > > Thanks again that you are working on this. This work is much appreciated. As > an author, it makes it much more easier when well defined terms can be > reused. It fosters a common understanding. I like that the document uses > multiple criteria's to describe the application. Section 3.4 describes that > well. > > My comments are editorial. Some of them suggest describing also the reasoning. > > Best wishes > Thomas
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
