Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-12: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Section 3.2 * Values from 0 to 65000 are allocated following a First-Come First- Served policy (Section 4.4 of [RFC8126]). Values in the ranges 0-10, 50-51, and 98-301 are already assigned; values in the ranges 11-49 and 52-97 MUST NOT be assigned. -- Why are 11-49 and 52-97 not just reserved? -- Per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words/, please remove the BCP14 key words from the IANA Considerations section. ** Section 3.2.2. What is the purpose of this section? The two registration policies for this registry are FCFS and experimental, neither of which have a designated expert. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Joel Halpern for the GENART review. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
