Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > Editorial -- As written this text is also confusing. The first > sentence talks about specifications which might be public eventually. > Then the second sentence opens with “This includes, …”, but talks about > specification which will never be released.
> Maybe say something to the effect of:
> Registrations for specifications that are not publicly available are
> acceptable. This includes specifications obtained via liaison
> agreements (such as to ITU-T, drafts, IEEE, etc.), those that may
> eventually be made public, or those for which no public document will
> be available.
I have put your text in place in git.
I/We mentioned classified things because we thought it was better to be
welcoming to allocation rather than cause squatting on values. If you think
it does not help, fine.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
