Dear Seyyed,

Thanks for reaching out to IETF OPSAWG.

I think the main differences between Network Telemetry and OpenTelemetry is 
that the network data collection protocols in Network Telemetry are covering 
the 3 network planes 
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9232#section-3.1), their schemas and 
their relationship among. This is key for a distributed system such as  network 
or internetwork.

OpenTelemetry is more generic and system focused. It proposes schema evolution 
with https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otel/schemas/ where with Network 
Telemetry at IETF NMOP, we thrive Message Broker integration with

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nmop-yang-message-broker-integration
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nmop-message-broker-telemetry-message
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-netana-nmop-yang-message-broker-message-key

which aligns with the Data Mesh paradigm.

The broadband forum is driving something similar with WT-508 which is very much 
related to what I was describing above.

Does that help?

Best wishes
Thomas

From: Seyyed Soroosh Hosseinalipour <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2026 5:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OPSAWG]Mail regarding rfc9232

Be aware: This is an external email.

ITNOA

Hi,

I want to know about correlation between RFC 9232 and OpenTelemetry (as a 
modern telemetry protocol) and ETSI SOL standard about VNF management and 
telemetry

thanks

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to