Greg — you state you have a concern with a sentence, but you do not explain what your concern is.
1. Can you please succinctly elaborate what specifically the concern is? Additionally, you ask what the value of a specific sentence is. 1. Can you please briefly clarity what is the negative value of the sentence? Just trying to understand the concern… Carlos Pignataro (He/Him) Founder and Principal Blue Fern Consulting<https://bluefern.consulting/> Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: Greg Mirsky via Datatracker <[email protected]> Date: Monday, January 26, 2026 at 9:49 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5706bis-01 early Perfmetrdir review Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5706bis Title: Guidelines for Considering Operations and Management in IETF Specifications Reviewer: Greg Mirsky Review result: Has Issues Dear Authors, Thank you for your work on this document. I wholeheartedly agree with your view that adding Operational Considerations to an IETF document will help in the deployment of the specified mechanism. I found the document well-written and easy to read. The concern I have is with the assertion of the relationship between the scopes of Operation and Management, Operation, Administration, and Maintenance, expressed in the Terminology section as: The broader concept of "operations and management" that is the subject of this document encompasses OAM, in addition to other management and provisioning tools and concepts. Can you reference a document that discusses that relationship? It seems that RFC 6291 avoided discussing this issue. In your opinion, what is the value of that assertion to the document? Regards, Greg
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
