On February 4, 2026 at 3:30:53 AM, Dhruv Dhody wrote: Dhruv:
Hi! Thanks for the review. I'm replying only to your query about the status and will let the authors address the rest. > ### Query > > - Is there a reason beyond updating RFC 2360 (BCP 22) that this I-D is a BCP? > The document is largely framed as guidance, guidelines, and recommendations > for authors and reviewers, similar in style and intent to RFC 5706, which was > published as Informational. Yes, the intent is to document what the community considers the best current thinking related to operations and management of a new protocol or protocol extension. Thanks! Alvaro.
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
