Hi, Panos, Thanks so much for your feedback! Please find some responses in-line (more coming...)
On 09/17/2015 02:10 AM, Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) wrote: > > I am struggling to understand the gap this draft fills. Please see Melinda's comments... > Finally, with all the "NGFW" products and features out there that > section 4 could include many more kinds of fws. Same for section 5. Would you mind elaborating on the kind of features that you're referring to? > In general, I think that the draft covers legacy firewalls mostly, > not all the modern fw features that exist today and I am not sure if > it tries to convince readers about their need (because I don't think > in today's world firewalling functionality can be rejected as > unnecessary by anyone) Please check many discussions in IETF circles. Many deem firewalls as evil. Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
