Indeed, the text in section 3.6 should be corrected (even if it is rather cosmetic as the error is pretty obvious).
Thanks Alexander for spotting it :-) -éric On 6/10/15 19:10, "RFC Errata System" <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> wrote: >The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6274, >"Security Assessment of the Internet Protocol Version 4". > >-------------------------------------- >You may review the report below and at: >http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6274&eid=4494 > >-------------------------------------- >Type: Editorial >Reported by: Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonni...@gmail.com> > >Section: 3.6 > >Original Text >------------- >In Figure 3, an attacker sends ... > >Corrected Text >-------------- >In Figure 5, an attacker sends ... > >Notes >----- >Text immediately below Figure 5 incorrectly references to incorrect >figure number 3. > >Instructions: >------------- >This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > >-------------------------------------- >RFC6274 (draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security-07) >-------------------------------------- >Title : Security Assessment of the Internet Protocol >Version 4 >Publication Date : July 2011 >Author(s) : F. Gont >Category : INFORMATIONAL >Source : Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network >Infrastructure >Area : Operations and Management >Stream : IETF >Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
