Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsec-v6-26: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for this work. It's a useful document to have. I don't have much to add that my fellow ADs have not already mentioned. One procedural nit: The shepherd writeup lacks an answer to the question "Why is this the proper type of RFC?" (I realize "Informational" is the right answer here. I would just prefer it if shepherds answered it anyway.) It is also almost 18 months old. _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
